Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 20, 2020

Premnauth v. 450 Concord Avenue Corp.

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:19-cv-09077
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Premnauth v. 450 Concord Ave. Corp., Judge Liman ordered the parties to submit their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement for fairness review.

Who this affects

The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act action, including Ann Premnauth and 450 Concord Ave. Corp., and any attorney seeking fees from the proposed settlement.

What happened

In Premnauth v. 450 Concord Ave. Corp., the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle in a case brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The court said that settlements in these cases, including proposed attorney-fee awards, must be reviewed for fairness. It ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement and a joint letter explaining why the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable by November 19, 2020.

Judge Lewis J. Liman also required information about confidentiality, non-disparagement terms, releases, possible incentive payments, and attorney fees. The court did not approve or reject the settlement at this stage and warned that inadequate documentation could lead it to reject the proposed fee award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Premnauth v. 450 Concord Avenue Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-09077
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Oct. 20, 2020

Background

Ann Premnauth brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing matters including minimum wages and overtime. The court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Court’s directive

The court explained that, under Second Circuit law, it must scrutinize an Fair Labor Standards Act settlement—including any proposed attorney-fee award—to determine whether it is fair. The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement and a joint letter by November 19, 2020. The letter must explain the basis for the proposed settlement and address the fairness factors discussed in Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc.

The court also required the parties to address any confidentiality, non-disparagement, or release provisions; any incentive payment to Premnauth; and any attorney-fee award to her counsel. If fees were requested, the parties were directed to provide supporting documentation. The court stated that merely identifying the fee as a proportion of the total settlement was not enough. Adequate support would normally include contemporaneous time records showing, for each attorney, the date, hours worked, and nature of the work. The court warned that insufficient documentation could result in rejection of the proposed fee award.

Disposition

The court ordered submission of the settlement materials and did not approve or reject the proposed settlement in this order. The order was entered by Judge Lewis J. Liman.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.