Hudson Valley Bone & Joint Surgeons, LLP v. CNA Financial Corporation
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:20-cv-06073
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Hudson Valley Bone & Joint Surgeons v. CNA Financial, Judge Briccetti ordered plaintiff to choose whether to amend its complaint or proceed against defendants’ dismissal motion.
Hudson Valley Bone & Joint Surgeons, LLP had to choose whether to amend its complaint by the specified deadline. CNA Financial Corporation and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford received the listed options for responding to any amended complaint.
What happened
Hudson Valley Bone & Joint Surgeons, LLP v. CNA Financial Corporation concerns defendants’ October 20, 2020 motion to dismiss the complaint.
The court ordered the plaintiff to notify the court by October 30 whether it would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint. If it amended, defendants could answer, file a new dismissal motion, or rely on their original motion.
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti did not decide the dismissal motion in this order. He set deadlines and directed the plaintiff to choose how to proceed.
The detailed version
- Hudson Valley Bone & Joint Surgeons, LLP v. CNA Financial Corporation · No. 7:20-cv-06073
- Vincent Briccetti
- Oct. 21, 2020
Background
Defendants CNA Financial Corporation and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford moved to dismiss the complaint on October 20, 2020. The order does not describe the claims or the arguments supporting dismissal.
Order
The court ordered Hudson Valley Bone & Joint Surgeons, LLP, to notify the court by October 30, 2020, whether it intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion to dismiss or would rely on the existing complaint.
If the plaintiff chose not to amend, the motion to dismiss would proceed under the regular schedule. The court stated that it was unlikely to give the plaintiff another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies revealed by the fully briefed motion arguments.
If the plaintiff chose to amend, it had to file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court of that choice. Within 21 days after the amendment, defendants could file an answer, file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court that they would rely on the initial motion to dismiss. The order also stated that briefing deadlines would be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local civil rules unless the court ordered otherwise.
Disposition and effect
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti’s order set procedural deadlines and required the plaintiff to choose between amending the complaint and proceeding on the existing complaint. The order did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss and did not decide the merits of the claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.