Small v. Stellar Management LTD
- Stewart Aaron
- 1:20-cv-02540
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Small v. Stellar Management, Judge Aaron approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.
Jonathan Small and the defendants, including Stellar Management LTD, are affected by the approved settlement and the dismissal of the action with prejudice.
What happened
In Small v. Stellar Management LTD, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement covering all issues in the Fair Labor Standards Act case. They submitted the settlement agreement, retainer agreement, and attorney time records for review.
The court found the settlement fair and reasonable. It accepted the agreement’s mutual general releases because Small no longer worked for Stellar, had experienced counsel, and the releases were limited in specified ways.
Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement and directed the clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Small v. Stellar Management LTD · No. 1:20-cv-02540
- Stewart Aaron
- Oct. 21, 2020
Background
Jonathan Small brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act against Stellar Management LTD and other defendants. On September 21, 2020, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement in principle covering all issues. After the matter was referred to Judge Stewart D. Aaron for disposition by consent, the parties submitted a proposed settlement, related papers, supplemental materials, a retainer agreement, attorney time records, and a fully executed settlement agreement.
Settlement review
The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the requirement that Fair Labor Standards Act settlements be fair and reasonable. The agreement included a mutual general release and released a claim that was not raised in the complaint. The court noted that such provisions are generally disfavored, but found that the settlement amount was slightly greater than 100% of Small’s potential recovery, reducing concerns about employer coercion.
The court also found the mutual general releases acceptable because Small no longer worked for the defendant, he was represented by experienced counsel, and the release covered individuals and entities other than the defendants only when they acted on behalf of, or in a legally connected relationship with, the defendants and only for claims arising from those activities.
Ruling
Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and requested that the clerk close the case.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.