Vasquez Ortega v. Paradis to Go LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-08593
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Vasquez Ortega v. Paradis to Go LLC, Judge Vyskocil approved the federal overtime-law settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.
The order resolved Eutiquio Vasquez Ortega’s claims against Paradis To Go LLC, Kimberly Paradis, and Mickael Paradis. It did not purport to affect claims that other employees might have.
What happened
Vasquez Ortega v. Paradis to Go LLC involved a proposed collective action concerning the defendants’ non-exempt employees since September 2016. The settlement resolved only Eutiquio Vasquez Ortega’s claims and did not purport to affect claims held by other employees.
The court reviewed the settlement under the federal wage law and Second Circuit standards. It found the settlement fair and reasonable because it followed mediation, information exchange, and arms-length negotiations, and because the amount paid before attorney’s fees exceeded the unpaid overtime alleged in the complaint.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil approved the settlement and ordered the case dismissed with prejudice. The court did not specifically rule on whether the plaintiff’s attorney’s hourly rates were reasonable, and it directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
The detailed version
- Vasquez Ortega v. Paradis to Go LLC · No. 1:19-cv-08593
- Vyskocil
- Oct. 22, 2020
Background
Eutiquio Vasquez Ortega brought the action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Paradis To Go LLC, Kimberly Paradis, and Mickael Paradis. The case was framed as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act concerning the defendants’ non-exempt employees since September 2016. The plaintiff did not seek certification of a class or collective group, either for discovery or in connection with the settlement.
The plaintiff informed the court that the case had settled and submitted a letter and supporting documents. The settlement resolved only the named plaintiff’s claims and did not purport to affect claims that other employees might have.
Court’s Review
The court reviewed the settlement for fairness under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Second Circuit law. The parties had participated in mediation with Magistrate Judge Robert Lehrburger. Although mediation was initially unsuccessful, the settlement resulted from continued information exchange and arms-length negotiations.
The court concluded that the settlement terms were fair and reasonable. It found the settlement amount reasonable in part because, before attorney’s fees, it compensated the plaintiff for more than the unpaid overtime alleged in the complaint. The court stated that its approval did not specifically address the reasonableness of the rates charged by the plaintiff’s attorney.
Disposition
The court approved the settlement and ordered that the case be dismissed with prejudice. It also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate pending motions, adjourn remaining dates, and close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.