Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 13, 2020

Linares v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-09497
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Linares v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered Timothy Linares to pay filing fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Timothy Linares, who was incarcerated and represented himself. The case would be dismissed without prejudice if he did not pay the fees or submit the required forms within 30 days.

What happened

In Linares v. Department of Corrections, Timothy Linares filed a civil case without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment.

The court ordered him, within 30 days, either to pay $400 or submit a completed application and authorization allowing installment payments from his prisoner account. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and no summons would issue at that time.

Judge Colleen McMahon warned that the action would be dismissed without prejudice if Linares did not comply. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Linares v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09497
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 13, 2020

Background

Timothy Linares brought this civil action while incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer. He submitted the complaint without paying the required filing fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees or a prisoner authorization.

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepayment. If that request is granted, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The prisoner authorization permits the facility to make those deductions and requires certified copies of the prisoner's account statements for the preceding six months.

Order

The court directed Linares, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $400 in fees, or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization. The documents had to identify docket number 20-CV-9497 (CM).

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Linares a copy of the order and note service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that if Linares failed to comply within the allowed period, the action would be dismissed without prejudice.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order noted that a dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a statutory strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), but this order did not make such a dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.