Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 13, 2020

Clark v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-09404
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Clark v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered Curtis Clark to pay fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Curtis Clark, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, was required to pay the fees or submit the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment.

What happened

In Clark v. Department of Corrections, Curtis Clark filed the case without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment. The court noted that he was incarcerated and representing himself.

The court gave Clark 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application and authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his account in installments. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and it did not issue a summons at that time.

Judge Colleen McMahon warned that the action would be dismissed if Clark did not comply within the allowed time. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Clark v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09404
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 13, 2020

Background

Curtis Clark, who was incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He filed the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees or a prisoner authorization. The opinion states that Clark filed the complaint with 49 other detainees and that the claims were later separated into individual cases.

Court’s order

The court directed Clark, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay $400 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or submit the required application and prisoner authorization forms. The authorization would allow the $350 filing fee to be withdrawn from his account in installments and would require certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee would not apply if the court granted permission to proceed without prepayment of fees.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Clark a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Clark complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and warning

Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which can limit a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees after three strikes. This order itself directed payment or submission of forms; it did not dismiss the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.