Clark v. Department of Corrections
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-09404
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Clark v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered Curtis Clark to pay fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment.
Curtis Clark, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, was required to pay the fees or submit the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment.
What happened
In Clark v. Department of Corrections, Curtis Clark filed the case without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment. The court noted that he was incarcerated and representing himself.
The court gave Clark 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application and authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his account in installments. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and it did not issue a summons at that time.
Judge Colleen McMahon warned that the action would be dismissed if Clark did not comply within the allowed time. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Clark v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09404
- Colleen McMahon
- Nov. 13, 2020
Background
Curtis Clark, who was incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He filed the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees or a prisoner authorization. The opinion states that Clark filed the complaint with 49 other detainees and that the claims were later separated into individual cases.
Court’s order
The court directed Clark, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay $400 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or submit the required application and prisoner authorization forms. The authorization would allow the $350 filing fee to be withdrawn from his account in installments and would require certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee would not apply if the court granted permission to proceed without prepayment of fees.
The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Clark a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Clark complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.
Appeal and warning
Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which can limit a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees after three strikes. This order itself directed payment or submission of forms; it did not dismiss the action.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.