Tate v. Department of Corrections
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-09487
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Tate v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered Morris Tate to pay filing fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment.
Morris Tate, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the required application and prisoner-authorization forms within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.
What happened
Tate v. Department of Corrections concerns Morris Tate’s civil action, which he filed while incarcerated and without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to proceed without prepayment. He was representing himself.
The court gave Tate 30 days from November 13, 2020, to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment and a prisoner authorization. If approved, the authorization would allow filing-fee payments to be deducted from his account in installments.
Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to mail Tate the order and stated that no summons would issue yet. The case would be processed if Tate complied, but the action would be dismissed if he did not. The court also denied him permission to appeal without prepaying fees.
The detailed version
- Tate v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09487
- Colleen McMahon
- Nov. 13, 2020
Background
Morris Tate, who was incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He filed the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization. The opinion states that Tate had filed the complaint with 49 other detainees and that a magistrate judge had separated the claims into separate cases.
Fee and application requirements
The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400—the $350 filing fee plus a $50 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees by submitting a signed application and a prisoner authorization. If permission is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.
Order
The court ordered Tate to comply within 30 days of the order by either paying the $400 in fees or submitting the attached application and prisoner-authorization forms, labeled with docket number 20-CV-9487 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail Tate a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Tate complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), subject to the exception stated in that statute for imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.