Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 16, 2020

Struthers v. Brann

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:20-cv-09412
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Struthers v. Brann, Judge McMahon ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days, or the case would be dismissed without prejudice.

Who this affects

Eon Struthers, who was required to pay the fees or submit the application and prisoner authorization to proceed with the action.

What happened

In Struthers v. Brann, Eon Struthers filed a civil action while incarcerated and represented himself. He submitted the complaint without the required fees, completed application, or authorization for fee payments from his account.

The court ordered Struthers, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization to proceed without prepaying fees. The court directed the Clerk to mail the order to two addresses and said that no summons would issue at that time.

If Struthers did not comply, the action would be dismissed without prejudice. Judge Colleen McMahon also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Struthers v. Brann · No. 1:20-cv-09412
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Nov. 16, 2020

Background

Eon Struthers, who was incarcerated at the time, brought this action without a lawyer. The complaint had originally been filed with complaints from 49 other detainees. The claims were later separated, and the Clerk’s Office opened a separate case for each plaintiff.

Struthers submitted the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying the fees, or a prisoner authorization. The order states that a prisoner must either pay $400—$350 for the filing fee and $50 for the administrative fee—or submit the application and authorization.

Court’s Order

The court gave Struthers 30 days from the date of the order to either pay the $400 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The authorization would permit deductions from his account, in installments, toward the $350 filing fee and would require certified copies of his account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee would not apply if the court granted his application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court directed that any submitted forms identify docket number 20-CV-9412 (CM). It directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Struthers at two listed addresses and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.

Disposition

The order did not decide the underlying claims. It required Struthers to satisfy the fee or application requirements. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed without prejudice, meaning the order did not state that refiling would be barred.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order was issued by Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.