Palompelli v. Smith
- Cathy Seibel
- 7:20-cv-08070
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Palompelli v. Smith, Judge Seibel dismissed claims against the medical department but ordered service on three individual defendants.
Frank Palompelli’s claims against the “Green Haven C.F. Medical Dept.” were dismissed, while his claims against Jillian Smith, Frederick Bernstein, and Carl J. Koenigsman were directed to proceed to service.
What happened
In Palompelli v. Smith, Frank Palompelli, who is representing himself, sued three medical personnel and the Green Haven Correctional Facility Medical Department under a federal civil-rights law. He sought damages for alleged constitutional-rights violations.
The court dismissed the claims against the “Green Haven C.F. Medical Dept.” because a correctional facility medical department is not a person that can be sued under that law. The court directed that the claims against Jillian Smith, Frederick Bernstein, and Carl J. Koenigsman be served.
Judge Cathy Seibel ordered the court clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to issue summonses and complete service paperwork. The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal, stating that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Palompelli v. Smith · No. 7:20-cv-08070
- Cathy Seibel
- Nov. 16, 2020
Background
Frank Palompelli, who is incarcerated and representing himself, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against a person acting under state authority for violating federal constitutional or statutory rights. He sought damages from Jillian Smith, Frederick Bernstein, Carl J. Koenigsman, and the “Green Haven C.F. Medical Dept.” The court had already allowed him to proceed without prepaying the filing fee.
Screening of the Complaint
The Prison Litigation Reform Act required the court to screen the complaint. The court explained that it had to dismiss any portion that was frivolous, malicious, failed to state a legally sufficient claim, sought money from an immune defendant, or fell outside the court’s jurisdiction.
The court dismissed Palompelli’s § 1983 claims against the “Green Haven C.F. Medical Dept.” for failure to state a claim. It held that a correctional facility’s medical department is not a “person” for purposes of § 1983. The opinion does not dismiss the claims against Smith, Bernstein, or Koenigsman at this stage.
Service of the Remaining Defendants
Because Palompelli was allowed to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, the court directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Smith, Bernstein, and Koenigsman. The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses are issued for those defendants. It instructed the clerk to issue the summonses, complete the required service forms, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service.
Disposition
The court dismissed Palompelli’s claims against the “Green Haven C.F. Medical Dept.” It directed service on Smith, Bernstein, and Koenigsman. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order further required Palompelli to notify the court in writing of any address change.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.