Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 16, 2020

Rosario v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-09410
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rosario v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered Emmanuel Rosario to pay filing fees or submit forms to proceed.

Who this affects

Emmanuel Rosario, an incarcerated self-represented plaintiff, was required to pay the filing fees or submit the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The case could be dismissed if he failed to comply within 30 days.

What happened

Rosario v. Department of Corrections is an order about the requirements for Emmanuel Rosario, who filed the case while incarcerated and without a lawyer, to move forward. The order did not decide the claims against the defendants.

The court gave Rosario 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without paying fees up front and a form authorizing installment deductions from his account. The court also required account statements covering the previous six months.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to mail the order to Rosario and said no summons would issue yet. If Rosario does not comply within the deadline, the action will be dismissed; the court also denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rosario v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09410
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 16, 2020

Background

Emmanuel Rosario filed this civil action while incarcerated and representing himself. The opinion states that he originally filed the complaint with 49 other detainees, but a magistrate judge severed the claims and directed the Clerk of Court to open separate cases. Rosario submitted his complaint without paying the required fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Fee and filing requirements

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $400—the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. That request requires a signed application and a prisoner authorization. If the court grants that request, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to deduct those payments and requires certified account statements for the prior six months.

Order

The court ordered Rosario, within 30 days of the order, to pay the $400 in fees or submit the attached fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 20-CV-9410 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail him the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Rosario complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures, but if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Judge Colleen McMahon also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner litigation statute, potentially limiting a prisoner’s ability to file future actions without prepaying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.