Delorenzo v. Sullivan County Jail Administration
- Nelson Roman
- 7:20-cv-07935
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In Delorenzo v. Sullivan County Jail Administration, Judge Román screened a prisoner’s medical-care suit, dismissed some defendants, and ordered service on others.
Delorenzo’s claims against Sullivan County Jail Administration and Health Care Services Administration were dismissed. His claims against the “Mental Health Administrator” were dismissed without prejudice. The court ordered service on the listed individual defendants, including Mike Schiff, Eric Chaboty, Harold Smith, James Ginty, Christopher Bini, Officer Taylor, Dr. Weiss, Lynn Wilcox, Dr. Mirza, Wendy Moore, Jennie Norris, and Katie Slater.
What happened
Delorenzo, who was incarcerated at Sullivan County Jail, brought this case without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law, alleging that defendants denied him medical and mental-health treatment. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.
During its required review of a prisoner’s complaint, the court dismissed the claims against Sullivan County Jail Administration and Health Care Services Administration because municipal departments cannot be sued separately under New York law. It also dismissed the claims against the “Mental Health Administrator” without prejudice because Delorenzo did not allege that person’s personal involvement or clearly identify the person.
The court ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the listed individual defendants and extended the service deadline to 90 days after summonses are issued. Judge Nelson S. Román also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Delorenzo v. Sullivan County Jail Administration · No. 7:20-cv-07935
- Nelson Roman
- Nov. 16, 2020
Background
Paul J. Delorenzo, Jr., who was incarcerated at Sullivan County Jail, filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that defendants denied him medical and mental-health treatment during his detention. The court had previously granted him permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee.
Screening standard
Because the plaintiff was a prisoner suing governmental entities or employees, the court was required to screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. Screening requires dismissal of claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a legally valid claim, seek relief from an immune defendant, or fall outside the court’s jurisdiction. The court also stated that it must read a complaint filed without a lawyer liberally and interpret it to raise the strongest claims reasonably suggested by the allegations.
Dismissed defendants
The court dismissed the claims against “Sullivan County Jail Administration” and “Health Care Services Administration.” It held that these entities were municipal departments without a separate legal identity and therefore could not be sued under New York law.
The court also dismissed the claims against the “Mental Health Administrator” without prejudice. The complaint did not allege facts showing that this defendant was personally involved, and it did not make clear whether the defendant was an identifiable person or a John Doe placeholder. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal did not bar Delorenzo from seeking permission to amend the complaint to add an individual defendant if he could allege supporting facts.
Service and appeal
The court directed the Clerk of Court to prepare forms and summonses so the U.S. Marshals Service could serve Mike Schiff, Eric Chaboty, Harold Smith, James Ginty, Christopher Bini, Officer Taylor, Dr. Weiss, Lynn Wilcox, Dr. Mirza, Wendy Moore, Jennie Norris, and Katie Slater. It extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses were issued. The order also required Delorenzo to notify the court if his address changed.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The opinion does not decide the underlying allegations about denial of medical or mental-health treatment.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.