Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 17, 2020

Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:20-cv-04334
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Geller Biopharm v. Amunix, Judge Cronan granted Amunix’s request to file reply-brief portions referring to the FSA under seal.

Who this affects

Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Geller Biopharm, Inc.; the ruling governs public access to specified portions of Amunix’s reply brief.

What happened

Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. concerns Amunix’s request to keep parts of its reply brief confidential.

Amunix sought to seal portions that quoted or described sensitive terms of the Second FSA. The request followed an earlier order allowing the Second FSA and descriptions of its terms to be filed under seal; Geller Biopharm consented.

Judge John P. Cronan granted Amunix’s request to file under seal the portions of its reply referring to the FSA.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-04334
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Nov. 17, 2020

Background

Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. asked the court for permission to file under seal portions of its reply brief supporting its motion to dismiss. Those portions described or directly quoted confidential and sensitive terms of the Second FSA. Amunix said the request was consistent with an earlier order allowing the Second FSA and descriptions of its terms to be filed under seal. The earlier order found that the competitive harm from disclosure outweighed the general presumption that court records should be public and that the proposed redactions were appropriately limited. Geller Biopharm, Inc.’s counsel consented to the request.

Ruling

The court granted Amunix’s request to file under seal the portions of its reply referring to the FSA. The provided text does not address the merits of Amunix’s motion to dismiss.

Disposition

The request to file the specified reply-brief portions under seal was granted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.