Peguero v. City Of New York
- Lewis Kaplan
- 1:20-cv-04518
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Peguero v. City of New York, Judge Freeman granted a stay while the Department of Correction investigated the alleged use of force.
The stay temporarily pauses Christopher Peguero’s civil-rights case against the City of New York and the other defendants while the Department of Correction’s internal investigation proceeds. The parties must provide recurring status reports.
What happened
Christopher Peguero sued the City of New York and others under a federal civil-rights law, alleging that a correction officer used excessive force against him while he was in custody. The City requested a stay, and Peguero’s lawyer consented.
The City said its internal investigation was still pending and limited access to documents, witness statements, and information from the officer. It also said the investigation affected decisions about defending the case and representing the officer. The City argued that Peguero would not be harmed by a stay because relevant documents would be preserved and the federal claim’s limitations period did not expire until March 13, 2023.
In Peguero v. City of New York, Judge Debra C. Freeman granted the jointly requested stay of all proceedings for the reasons stated in the City’s letter. The parties had to file a joint status report by December 15, 2020, and every 30 days afterward until the stay was lifted.
The detailed version
- Peguero v. City Of New York · No. 1:20-cv-04518
- Lewis Kaplan
- Nov. 18, 2020
Background
Christopher Peguero brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that permits certain civil-rights claims, alleging that a New York City Department of Correction officer identified as “John Doe,” Badge #1583, attacked him without provocation and punched and kicked him while using curses and demeaning words. He also alleged that the City of New York was municipally liable.
The City requested a stay, meaning a temporary pause in the case, until the Department of Correction finished its internal investigation of the alleged incident. The City said the investigation was incomplete and that Peguero’s counsel consented to the request.
Arguments for the Stay
The City argued that the pending investigation limited access to relevant records and witness statements because of asserted law-enforcement and deliberative-process privileges. It also said the investigation limited its ability to obtain information from the involved officer, in part because the officer might face criminal or departmental proceedings and could have conflicting interests with the City.
The City further stated that it could not decide whether to represent the officer under New York General Municipal Law § 50-k until the investigation concluded and its findings were issued. It argued that Peguero would not be prejudiced because relevant documents would be obtained and preserved during the investigation, and because the limitations period for his federal claim did not expire until March 13, 2023.
Ruling
Judge Debra C. Freeman granted the jointly requested stay of all proceedings for the reasons stated in counsel’s letter. The order did not decide the merits of Peguero’s excessive-force or municipal-liability claims. It directed the parties to submit a joint status report no later than December 15, 2020, and every 30 days thereafter until the stay was lifted.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.