Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 18, 2020

Squire v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-09495
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Squire v. Department of Corrections: Judge McMahon ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Sonny Squire was required to pay $400 or submit the required IFP application and prisoner authorization within 30 days; otherwise, the action would be dismissed.

What happened

In Squire v. Department of Corrections, Sonny Squire filed a civil lawsuit without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The opinion says he was detained at the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island and was representing himself.

The court gave Squire 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application and prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his account and would provide the court with six months of account statements. No summons would issue at that time.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to mail the order to Squire and stated that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the deadline. She also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Squire v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09495
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 18, 2020

Background

Sonny Squire filed this civil action without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without prepaying the fees, or a prisoner authorization. The opinion states that Squire was detained at the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island and was proceeding without a lawyer. It also states that his complaint was originally filed with 49 other detainees and that the claims were later separated into individual cases.

Order

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit an IFP application and prisoner authorization. If IFP status is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner's account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to send the court certified account statements for the previous six months.

The court ordered Squire, within 30 days of the order, to choose one of those two options. Any IFP application and prisoner authorization had to identify docket number 20-CV-9495 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail Squire a copy of the order and record service on the docket. The court stated that no summons would issue at that time and that the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures if Squire complied. If he failed to comply within the permitted time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and caution

Judge McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal of a prisoner's civil action as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim may count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court did not decide the underlying claims in the complaint.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.