Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 18, 2020

Kargo Global, Inc. v. Angelette

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:20-cv-07535
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kargo Global v. Angelette, Judge Failla granted in part and denied in part a petition to compel arbitration.

Who this affects

Kargo Global, Inc. and Sarah Angelette; the court did not refer all claims to arbitration.

What happened

Kargo Global, Inc. v. Sarah Angelette concerned Kargo Global’s request to require arbitration. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute.

At a November 18, 2020 hearing, the court granted in part and denied in part Kargo Global’s petition to compel arbitration. The court did not refer all claims to arbitration, and no party requested a stay of the case.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the Clerk of Court to terminate pending motions, adjourn remaining dates, and close the case. The opinion does not explain which parts of the petition were granted or denied.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kargo Global, Inc. v. Angelette · No. 1:20-cv-07535
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Nov. 18, 2020

Background

Kargo Global, Inc. filed a petition to compel arbitration, meaning it asked the court to require the dispute, or parts of it, to be decided through arbitration rather than in court. The opinion does not provide facts about the underlying dispute or the parties’ arguments. It states that the court gave its reasons at the November 18, 2020 hearing.

Ruling

The court’s order states that Kargo Global’s petition to compel arbitration was granted in part and denied in part. A footnote explains that the court declined to refer all claims to arbitration. The court also stated that no party had requested a stay, or pause, of the case and that there was no longer a live controversy to stay because the petition—the only matter before the court—had been resolved.

Disposition

The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close the case. The opinion does not specify which portions of the petition were granted or denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.