Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 18, 2020

Komatsu v. The City of New York

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:20-cv-07046
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Komatsu v. City of New York, Judge Ramos ordered Marshals to serve the City after allowing Komatsu to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Towaki Komatsu, the City of New York, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the other defendants named in the related actions were affected by the service and filing instructions. The order did not decide the merits of Komatsu’s claims.

What happened

In Komatsu v. The City of New York, Towaki Komatsu, representing himself, alleged that city employees and others unlawfully prevented him from attending public meetings. He brought claims under federal civil-rights laws and New York law.

The court had allowed Komatsu to proceed without paying court fees. Because of that status, the court directed the Clerk to issue a summons and prepare the paperwork for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the City of New York in Case No. 20-cv-07502.

Judge Edgardo Ramos extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and said Komatsu should request more time if service is not completed. The order did not decide whether his claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Komatsu v. The City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-07046
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Nov. 18, 2020

Background

Towaki Komatsu, proceeding without a lawyer, brought several related actions under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1988, as well as New York law. He alleged that defendants unlawfully prevented him from attending several public meetings. The City of New York was named in each action; other defendants included Mayor Bill de Blasio, former Police Commissioner James O’Neill, and various police officers or public officials, depending on the meeting involved.

The court had granted Komatsu permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees in each case. The order concerned Case No. 20-cv-07502 and addressed service of process—the formal delivery of the summons and complaint to the defendants—not the merits of Komatsu’s allegations.

Service Order

Because Komatsu was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to carry out service. The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, issue a summons, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service so it could serve the City of New York at 100 Church Street, New York, New York 10007.

The court extended the time for service to 90 days after the summons is issued. It stated that, if service was not completed within that period, Komatsu should request an extension. The court also warned that Komatsu must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the action could be dismissed if he failed to do so.

Disposition

Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the Clerk to mail Komatsu a copy of the order and an information package, prepare the service forms, issue the summons, and provide the documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The order did not rule on the validity of the claims or determine whether any defendant violated the law.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.