Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, LLC
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:18-cv-09860
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, Judge Briccetti approved the parties’ wage-settlement agreement and ordered the case closed.
The settlement affected Julian Perdomo, the other collective plaintiffs and class members identified in the case, and defendants 113-117 Realty, LLC, Direct Property Management LLC, and Lawrence Marolda.
What happened
In Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, LLC, Julian Perdomo brought a Fair Labor Standards Act case for himself, other collective plaintiffs, and the class against the defendants.
The parties submitted a settlement agreement for court review. The court considered the value of the claims, litigation risks and costs, Perdomo’s representation by counsel, mediation, his former employment, and the agreement’s confidentiality and release provisions.
The court found the settlement fair, reasonable, and free from fraud or collusion. It also approved attorneys’ fees equal to one-third of the total recovery. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement and instructed the Clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, LLC · No. 7:18-cv-09860
- Vincent Briccetti
- Nov. 20, 2020
Background
Julian Perdomo sued 113-117 Realty, LLC; Direct Property Management LLC; and Lawrence Marolda under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The caption identifies Perdomo as acting for himself, other collective plaintiffs, and the class. The parties filed a settlement agreement and a joint statement explaining its basis, as required for the court’s review.
Court’s analysis
The court considered the parties’ views about the value of the claims; the risks and costs of continued litigation; Perdomo’s representation by counsel; the fact that he no longer worked for the defendants; the assistance of a mediator; and the agreement’s confidentiality provision. The confidentiality provision covered only the settlement amount. The court also noted that the release was broad but limited to claims accrued before the agreement was executed and to claims arising from Perdomo’s employment and involving wages or benefits under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York State Labor Law.
Ruling
The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than fraud or collusion. It separately found that attorneys’ fees equal to one-third of the total recovery were fair and reasonable under the circumstances. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement agreement and instructed the Clerk to close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.