Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2020

Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, LLC

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:18-cv-09860
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, Judge Briccetti approved the parties’ wage-settlement agreement and ordered the case closed.

Who this affects

The settlement affected Julian Perdomo, the other collective plaintiffs and class members identified in the case, and defendants 113-117 Realty, LLC, Direct Property Management LLC, and Lawrence Marolda.

What happened

In Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, LLC, Julian Perdomo brought a Fair Labor Standards Act case for himself, other collective plaintiffs, and the class against the defendants.

The parties submitted a settlement agreement for court review. The court considered the value of the claims, litigation risks and costs, Perdomo’s representation by counsel, mediation, his former employment, and the agreement’s confidentiality and release provisions.

The court found the settlement fair, reasonable, and free from fraud or collusion. It also approved attorneys’ fees equal to one-third of the total recovery. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement and instructed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perdomo v. 113-117 Realty, LLC · No. 7:18-cv-09860
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Nov. 20, 2020

Background

Julian Perdomo sued 113-117 Realty, LLC; Direct Property Management LLC; and Lawrence Marolda under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The caption identifies Perdomo as acting for himself, other collective plaintiffs, and the class. The parties filed a settlement agreement and a joint statement explaining its basis, as required for the court’s review.

Court’s analysis

The court considered the parties’ views about the value of the claims; the risks and costs of continued litigation; Perdomo’s representation by counsel; the fact that he no longer worked for the defendants; the assistance of a mediator; and the agreement’s confidentiality provision. The confidentiality provision covered only the settlement amount. The court also noted that the release was broad but limited to claims accrued before the agreement was executed and to claims arising from Perdomo’s employment and involving wages or benefits under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York State Labor Law.

Ruling

The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than fraud or collusion. It separately found that attorneys’ fees equal to one-third of the total recovery were fair and reasonable under the circumstances. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement agreement and instructed the Clerk to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.