Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 23, 2020

Villeral Echavarria Tejeda v. La Bodeguita de Rosa, Corp.

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:19-cv-06477
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Villeral Echavarria Tejeda v. La Bodeguita de Rosa, Corp., Judge Failla granted an agreed extension for filing settlement papers.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, who received additional time to file settlement papers.

What happened

Villeral Echavarria Tejeda asked the court to extend the deadline for submitting settlement materials while the parties finalized a Rule 68 offer of judgment. The request was made with the parties’ agreement.

The requested change would replace the November 23, 2020 deadline with a deadline to submit the offer and would extend the deadline by two weeks.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application and directed the parties to file settlement papers by December 7, 2020.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Villeral Echavarria Tejeda v. La Bodeguita de Rosa, Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-06477
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Nov. 23, 2020

Background

The plaintiff’s attorney told the court that the parties intended to resolve the case through a Rule 68 offer of judgment, which is a formal offer to allow judgment on specified terms. The defendants needed additional time to finalize and sign the offer. The parties jointly requested that the November 23, 2020 deadline for submitting settlement materials be changed to a deadline for submitting the offer and extended by two weeks.

Ruling

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. The court directed the parties to file settlement papers by December 7, 2020. The opinion does not state the terms of the proposed settlement or resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.