Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 23, 2020

Perez v. Healthy Choice Gourmet, Inc.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:20-cv-05401
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Perez v. Healthy Choice Gourmet, Judge Aaron required the parties to submit information supporting their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.

Who this affects

The parties to Salvador Perez’s Fair Labor Standards Act case, including Healthy Choice Gourmet, Inc. and the other defendants, were required to provide information for court review of their settlement.

What happened

Salvador Perez and the defendants reached a settlement during mediation in this Fair Labor Standards Act case.

The court required the parties to file a joint letter or motion explaining whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. The filing must address the claims and defenses, possible damages, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the negotiation process, attorney fees, and the settlement agreement itself.

The filing was due by December 23, 2020. Judge Stewart D. Aaron did not approve or reject the settlement in this order; he directed the parties to provide the required information for review.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. Healthy Choice Gourmet, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-05401
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Nov. 23, 2020

Background

The case includes claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing wages and working conditions. The parties reached a settlement during mediation. The parties had consented to have the magistrate judge decide the matter under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Required Settlement Filing

The court relied on the requirements of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. and directed the parties to file a joint letter or motion addressing whether their settlement is fair and reasonable. The filing was due by Wednesday, December 23, 2020.

The court required the filing to discuss the claims and defenses, the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s case, the defendants’ defenses, reasons for any difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount, the litigation and negotiation process, and other information relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including whether a judgment would be collectible after trial.

The parties also had to explain the attorney-fee arrangement, attach the retainer agreement, provide information about the attorneys’ hours and experience, and attach the settlement agreement itself.

Disposition

The order directed the parties to submit the specified materials. It did not approve or reject the settlement. Judge Stewart D. Aaron signed the order on November 23, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.