Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 24, 2020

Pacheco v. United States

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-09384
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Pacheco v. United States, Judge McMahon ordered Pacheco to pay fees or submit an amended fee-waiver application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Rodolfo Pacheco and the processing of his civil action; the order requires him to pay the filing fees or submit an amended application before the case proceeds.

What happened

Pacheco v. United States concerns Rodolfo Pacheco’s request to proceed without paying court fees upfront. He is representing himself.

The court found that his application did not explain how he pays his living expenses, so it could not determine that he is unable to pay. The court ordered him to pay $400 or submit an amended application within 30 days.

Judge Colleen McMahon also directed that no summons issue yet and stated that the action will be dismissed if Pacheco does not comply. The court denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pacheco v. United States · No. 1:20-cv-09384
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 24, 2020

Background

Rodolfo Pacheco filed this civil action representing himself. To proceed in the Southern District of New York, he had to either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a signed application asking to proceed without paying those fees upfront.

The Court’s Analysis

Pacheco submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees. The application stated that he had no income, resources, expenses, or debts. The court found that these answers did not explain how he pays for his living expenses. As a result, the court could not determine that he lacked sufficient funds to pay the fees.

Ruling and Next Steps

The court ordered Pacheco, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application must explain how he supports himself and provide facts establishing that he cannot pay the fees. If the court grants the amended application, he may proceed without prepaying the fees.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail Pacheco a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Pacheco complied, and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.