Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 25, 2020

Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:19-cv-09506
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Wang v. Verizon, Judge Lehrburger stayed discovery and related deadlines pending any amended complaint.

Who this affects

The stay affected Hao Zhe Wang and the defendants, including Verizon New England Inc., by pausing discovery and related deadlines while awaiting any amended complaint.

What happened

In Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc., the defendants asked the court to clarify what should happen to the case schedule after the court dismissed the existing complaint and allowed Hao Zhe Wang time to file another amended complaint. Wang was representing himself.

The defendants asked the court to cancel the scheduling order, stop all discovery, withdraw pending discovery between Wang and Verizon New England Inc., and issue a new schedule after the pleadings were settled.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger ordered that all discovery and resulting deadlines were stayed while the parties awaited an amended complaint. He also ordered the parties to submit a joint proposed order within 30 days after any amended complaint was filed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-09506
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Nov. 25, 2020

Background

The defendants submitted a request for clarification concerning the case’s scheduling order. The court had previously stayed discovery concerning 25 defendants while a motion to dismiss was pending, while allowing discovery concerning Verizon New England Inc. to continue. On October 8, 2020, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint as to all claims and all defendants, including Verizon New England Inc., and gave Wang 30 days to file an amended complaint. On October 27, 2020, the court extended that deadline to December 21, 2020. The opinion states that no operative complaint was then on file.

Defendants’ Request

The defendants argued that the existing discovery and litigation deadlines could not operate while Wang had time to file another amended complaint. They requested that the scheduling order be vacated in its entirety, that all discovery be stayed, that pending discovery between Wang and Verizon New England Inc. be treated as withdrawn, and that the court later issue a new scheduling order after the pleadings were settled.

Ruling

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger ordered that “[a]ll discovery and ensuing deadlines are stayed pending filing of an amended complaint.” The court further ordered that, within 30 days after an amended complaint was filed, if one was filed, the parties must submit a joint proposed order. The order does not separately state that the scheduling order was vacated in its entirety, that pending discovery was withdrawn, or that a new scheduling order was entered at that time. This was a procedural order about discovery and scheduling, not a decision on the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.