Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 24, 2020

Cruz v. Will Leather Goods

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:20-cv-05143
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Judge Broderick dismissed Cruz v. Will Leather Goods without prejudice because Cruz did not prosecute the case.

Who this affects

The dismissal ended Shael Cruz's action against Will Leather Goods without prejudice. The opinion does not address the underlying claims.

What happened

In Cruz v. Will Leather Goods, Shael Cruz sued Will Leather Goods, but the defendant did not appear or respond to the complaint.

The court ordered Cruz to request a default judgment by November 20, 2020, warning that the case could be dismissed if Cruz did not act. Cruz took no further action and showed no intent to continue the case.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cruz v. Will Leather Goods · No. 1:20-cv-05143
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Nov. 24, 2020

Background

Shael Cruz filed the action on July 6, 2020. An electronic summons was issued the next day. Will Leather Goods did not appear or respond to the complaint.

Court-Ordered Deadline

On November 5, 2020, the court ordered Cruz to move for a default judgment by November 20, 2020, or risk dismissal for failure to prosecute. The opinion states that Cruz took no action after that order and showed no intent to prosecute the action.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. The court cited its authority to dismiss a case on its own for failure to prosecute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.