Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Nov. 30, 2020

Media Force Ltd. v. Precise Leads, Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-04050
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentContract
In one sentence

In Media Force Ltd. v. Precise Leads, Inc., Judge Torres confirmed an arbitration award and interest but denied fees and costs.

Who this affects

Media Force received confirmation of the arbitration award and interest. Precise Leads became subject to a money judgment for the amounts awarded in arbitration and applicable interest; Media Force did not receive its requested attorneys’ fees and costs for the federal action.

What happened

Media Force Ltd. v. Precise Leads, Inc. involved Media Force’s request to have an arbitration award turned into a court judgment. Precise Leads did not appear to oppose the request.

The parties’ agreement required binding arbitration for disputes about the agreement. After a payment dispute, an arbitrator found that Precise Leads had failed to make required payments and ordered it to pay Media Force unpaid invoices, arbitration fees and costs, and interest.

Judge Analisa Torres confirmed the award and granted prejudgment interest at nine percent from May 6, 2020, to the date of judgment, along with post-judgment interest at the legal rate. She denied Media Force’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs for the federal court case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Media Force Ltd. v. Precise Leads, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-04050
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Nov. 30, 2020

Background

Media Force Ltd. petitioned under Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act to confirm an arbitration award against Precise Leads, Inc. The parties had an agreement concerning Media Force’s marketing efforts that required binding arbitration before the American Arbitration Association for disputes regarding the agreement.

Media Force initiated arbitration on July 9, 2019, alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment based on Precise Leads’ failure to pay for services. Precise Leads did not appear in the arbitration. Arbitrator William H. Cosby found that Precise Leads violated the agreement by failing to make the required payments. The award ordered Precise Leads to pay $332,418.42 in outstanding invoices, $13,904.46 in attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the arbitration, and $6,172.50 in arbitration-related administrative fees and expenses. It also awarded nine percent interest on the outstanding invoices, beginning 31 days after the award until payment.

Precise Leads also did not appear in the federal case. Media Force requested confirmation of the award, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the federal action.

Legal standard

The Federal Arbitration Act requires a court to confirm an arbitration award unless a statutory basis exists to vacate, modify, or correct it. Courts give arbitration awards substantial deference and generally enforce an award if there is at least a barely colorable justification for the result.

Because Precise Leads did not answer the petition, the Court treated the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute over a material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Even without an opposing party, the Court still had to review Media Force’s submissions and determine whether Media Force met its burden.

Rulings

The Court found that the dispute was subject to arbitration, that Media Force had shown at least a barely colorable justification for the award, and that no genuine dispute of material fact prevented confirmation. The Court therefore confirmed the arbitration award.

The Court granted prejudgment interest at nine percent from May 6, 2020—the date of the arbitration award—to the date of judgment. It also granted post-judgment interest at the statutory rate applicable to civil money judgments.

The Court denied Media Force’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in pursuing the federal action. Media Force had not stated the amount sought or provided the documentation needed to show that the requested fees were reasonable.

Disposition

The petition to confirm the award was granted. The request for attorneys’ fees and costs for the federal action was denied. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment against Precise Leads for $332,418.42 in unpaid invoices, $13,904.46 in arbitration attorneys’ fees and costs, $6,172.50 in arbitration administrative fees and expenses, nine-percent prejudgment interest from May 6, 2020, to the date of judgment, and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. The case was closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.