Diaz v. United By Blue Walnut Street LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:18-cv-12388
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Diaz v. United By Blue Walnut Street LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after mediation, allowing restoration by December 29, 2020, or dismissal with prejudice if none is filed.
Edwin Diaz, the other similarly situated persons he identified in the action, and United By Blue Walnut Street LLC were affected by the court’s order discontinuing the action subject to the stated restoration deadline.
What happened
Diaz v. United By Blue Walnut Street LLC involved Edwin Diaz’s action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated people. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
A mediator informed the court that the parties participated in court-ordered mediation and reached an agreement on all issues.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the action discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made by December 29, 2020. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Diaz v. United By Blue Walnut Street LLC · No. 1:18-cv-12388
- Vyskocil
- Nov. 27, 2020
Background
Edwin Diaz brought the action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated persons against United By Blue Walnut Street LLC. The opinion does not state the underlying legal claims or the terms of the parties’ agreement.
Mediation and Agreement
The court received a notice from the mediator stating that the parties participated in court-ordered mediation and reached an agreement on all issues.
Disposition
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by December 29, 2020. The order further stated that, if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. The opinion does not provide further details about the agreement or the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.