Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2020

Foster v. John or Jane Doe, M.D.

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-09924
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Foster Hasheem v. John or Jane Doe, M.D., Judge McMahon ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees; no summons issued.

Who this affects

Foster Hasheem, a prisoner representing himself, was required to pay the filing fees or submit the specified fee-waiver paperwork within 30 days. The action could be dismissed for noncompliance, and no summons issued at that time.

What happened

Foster Hasheem v. John or Jane Doe, M.D. was filed by a prisoner representing himself, but he did not submit the required fees or paperwork to proceed without paying fees upfront.

The court gave him 30 days to pay $400 or submit a completed application and authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his prison account. The court did not issue summonses at that time.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to mail the order to Foster Hasheem and stated that the case would be processed if he complied; otherwise, the action would be dismissed. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Foster v. John or Jane Doe, M.D. · No. 1:20-cv-09924
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Dec. 1, 2020

Background

Foster Hasheem, who was incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer, filed this civil action without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Payment or fee-waiver requirement

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit the required application and authorization. If the court grants the application, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to send the court certified account statements for the preceding six months.

The court gave Foster Hasheem 30 days from the order's date to pay the fees or submit the application and authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-9924 (CM). The order stated that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within that period.

Other actions by the court

The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Foster Hasheem and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Foster Hasheem complied, the Clerk's Office would process the case under its procedures. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. Finally, the order warned that certain dismissals of a prisoner's federal civil action can count as strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and that three strikes generally prevent the prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees unless he faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.