Foster v. John or Jane Doe, M.D.
- Louis Stanton
- 1:20-cv-09924
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Foster Hasheem v. John or Jane Doe, M.D., Judge McMahon ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees; no summons issued.
Foster Hasheem, a prisoner representing himself, was required to pay the filing fees or submit the specified fee-waiver paperwork within 30 days. The action could be dismissed for noncompliance, and no summons issued at that time.
What happened
Foster Hasheem v. John or Jane Doe, M.D. was filed by a prisoner representing himself, but he did not submit the required fees or paperwork to proceed without paying fees upfront.
The court gave him 30 days to pay $400 or submit a completed application and authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his prison account. The court did not issue summonses at that time.
Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to mail the order to Foster Hasheem and stated that the case would be processed if he complied; otherwise, the action would be dismissed. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.
The detailed version
- Foster v. John or Jane Doe, M.D. · No. 1:20-cv-09924
- Louis Stanton
- Dec. 1, 2020
Background
Foster Hasheem, who was incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer, filed this civil action without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.
Payment or fee-waiver requirement
The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit the required application and authorization. If the court grants the application, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to send the court certified account statements for the preceding six months.
The court gave Foster Hasheem 30 days from the order's date to pay the fees or submit the application and authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-9924 (CM). The order stated that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within that period.
Other actions by the court
The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Foster Hasheem and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Foster Hasheem complied, the Clerk's Office would process the case under its procedures. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. Finally, the order warned that certain dismissals of a prisoner's federal civil action can count as strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and that three strikes generally prevent the prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees unless he faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.