Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 3, 2020

Peralta v. Universal Protection Service, LLC

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:20-cv-06388
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Peralta v. Universal Protection Service, LLC, Judge Daniels ordered paperwork for U.S. Marshals service and set a February 2, 2021 deadline.

Who this affects

Robinson Peralta, the defendants named in the complaint, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Peralta v. Universal Protection Service, LLC involved service of Robinson Peralta’s complaint after the court allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. The court explained that people granted this permission may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve defendants.

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete the required service forms and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service for Universal Protection Services, LLC, doing business as Allied Universal. Because summonses were issued on November 4, 2020, Peralta had until February 2, 2021, to serve the defendants. The court found his request for additional time premature and adjourned the initial conference to February 4, 2021.

Judge George B. Daniels ordered the Clerk to complete the service forms using the listed address and deliver the documents to the Marshals Service. The order addressed service and scheduling, not the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Peralta v. Universal Protection Service, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-06388
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Dec. 3, 2020

Background

Robinson Peralta was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. The court explained that, because of that permission, he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court had ordered summonses issued on November 4, 2020, and extended the service period to 90 days after the summonses were issued.

Service instructions

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Universal Protection Services, LLC, doing business as Allied Universal, and to send the summons and other necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The order lists an address for that defendant at 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011.

Peralta requested an extension of time to serve the defendants until 60 days after defendant companies provided addresses where service could be made. The court determined that request was premature. Based on the November 4 summons date, the court stated that Peralta had until February 2, 2021, to serve the defendants. Because of delays in service, it adjourned the initial conference from December 17, 2020, to February 4, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.

Disposition

Judge George B. Daniels ordered the Clerk to complete the service forms and deliver the documents needed for service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The opinion did not decide the merits of Peralta’s claims or state a disposition of any claim against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.