Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2020

Evans v. Department of Corrections

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:20-cv-10124
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Evans v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered James Evans to pay fees or submit forms seeking permission to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

James Evans, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, had to pay the required fees or submit an application and authorization to proceed without prepayment within 30 days. The case could be dismissed if he did not comply.

What happened

In Evans v. Department of Corrections, James Evans, who is incarcerated and representing himself, brought a civil action but did not pay the required fees or submit the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment.

The court gave Evans 30 days to pay $400 or submit a signed application and authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his account. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and no summons would issue at that time. If Evans did not comply, the action would be dismissed.

Judge Colleen McMahon directed these filing steps, denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the claims’ merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Evans v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-10124
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Dec. 4, 2020

Background

James Evans, who was incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center and was proceeding without a lawyer, brought this civil action. The opinion states that Evans had signed an amended complaint in a prior related proceeding. A magistrate judge later separated the claims of 13 detainees into individual cases, and Evans’s claims were placed under this docket number.

Filing-fee requirement

A prisoner starting a federal civil action must either pay the required fees or request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that the total fees were $400: a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee. A prisoner granted permission to proceed without prepayment still must pay the $350 filing fee in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The prisoner must therefore submit both a completed application and an authorization allowing deductions from the prisoner’s account and requiring certified account statements for the previous six months.

Court’s order

The court ordered Evans, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $400 in fees or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 20-CV-10124 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail Evans a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Evans failed to comply within the permitted period, the action would be dismissed. If he complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures.

Appeal certification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim could count as a statutory “strike” affecting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future cases.

What the order did not decide

This order addressed filing fees and the required application materials. It did not decide whether Evans’s underlying claims were legally valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.