Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2020

Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:20-cv-10142
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Social SecurityPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Briccetti ordered payment of filing fees or a complete fee-waiver application.

Who this affects

Antonio Martinez, who was required to pay the filing fees or submit a complete application to proceed without prepaying them; the underlying Social Security dispute was not decided.

What happened

In Antonio Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security, Antonio Martinez filed the case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fees. He submitted only page two of the required two-page application, so the court could not determine whether he could pay.

The court ordered Martinez to pay $400 or submit a fully completed application by January 4, 2021. The court did not issue a summons at that time and said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying Social Security dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 7:20-cv-10142
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Dec. 4, 2020

Background

Antonio Martinez brought this action without a lawyer. To begin a civil case in the court, a person must either pay $400 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application asking to proceed without paying those fees in advance.

Martinez submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees, but he provided only page two of the two-page form. The court therefore could not determine whether he had insufficient funds to pay the fees.

Order

The court ordered Martinez, by January 4, 2021, to do one of two things: pay the $400 in fees or submit a fully completed application. The court stated that, if it approved a new application, Martinez could proceed without paying the fees in advance. The court directed that no summons issue at that time and stated that the action would be dismissed if Martinez did not comply with the order within the allowed time.

Appeal and scope of ruling

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This order addressed filing-fee requirements and did not decide the merits of Martinez's underlying Social Security claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.