Subramanian v. Lupin Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:17-cv-05040
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Subramanian v. Lupin Inc., Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.
Veerappan Subramanian and Lupin, Inc., the parties to the discontinued action.
What happened
Subramanian v. Lupin Inc. was reported to have settled in principle, while the parties were finalizing their settlement agreement.
The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or resolve the parties’ legal dispute. It addresses only the case’s status while settlement was being completed.
Judge Ronnie Abrams discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it within 30 days. The court stated that later applications to reopen could be denied solely because they were filed after that deadline.
The detailed version
- Subramanian v. Lupin Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-05040
- Ronnie Abrams
- Dec. 7, 2020
Background
The court stated that the case had been settled in principle and that the parties were finalizing a settlement agreement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the terms of the proposed settlement.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It further stated that any application to reopen filed after 30 days could be denied solely on that basis.
The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. Judge Ronnie Abrams signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.