Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 7, 2020

Jones v. Henderson

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-10008
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jones v. Henderson, Judge McMahon ordered Denise Jones to pay $400 or submit an amended application to proceed without paying upfront.

Who this affects

Denise Jones, who must either pay the $400 fees or submit an amended application to proceed without paying them in advance; the action could be dismissed if she does not comply.

What happened

In Jones v. Henderson, Denise Jones filed the case without a lawyer. The court said she had to either pay the required fees or properly request permission to proceed without paying them in advance.

Jones reported $69,000 in yearly wages, additional payments from a pension, annuity, or life insurance, no money in the bank, no property, one dependent, no housing, transportation, or utility expenses, and about $14,000 in student-loan debt. The court found that her application did not show that she was unable to pay the fees.

The court ordered Jones, within 30 days, to pay $400 or submit an amended application with facts showing that she could not pay. Judge McMahon also directed that no summons issue yet and stated that the case would be dismissed if Jones did not comply. The order did not decide the claims in the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jones v. Henderson · No. 1:20-cv-10008
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 7, 2020

Background

Denise Jones brought this action without a lawyer. To proceed in the Southern District of New York, she had to either pay $400 in fees—$350 for filing and $50 for administration—or submit a signed application to proceed without paying fees in advance, commonly called an IFP application.

Jones submitted an IFP application. The court found that her answers did not establish that she was unable to pay. She reported gross yearly wages of $69,000 and additional payments from a pension, annuity, or life insurance. She also reported having no money in the bank and owning no property, one dependent, no housing, transportation, or utility expenses, and approximately $14,000 in student-loan debt.

Order

The court ordered Jones to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $400 in fees or submit an amended IFP application. Any amended application had to use docket number 20-CV-10008 (CM) and provide facts addressing the deficiencies identified by the court. If the court granted the amended application, Jones would be allowed to proceed without paying the fees in advance.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Jones and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Jones complied, and that the action would be dismissed if she failed to comply within the permitted time. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order did not reach the merits of Jones’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.