Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 8, 2020

Ortiz v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-10127
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ortiz v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered payment or a request to proceed without prepaying fees, plus an original signature, warning of dismissal.

Who this affects

Juan Ortiz, a prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, whose action could be processed only if he timely completed the required fee and signature paperwork.

What happened

Ortiz v. Department of Corrections concerns Juan Ortiz, who was proceeding without a lawyer. The court said he had not paid the required fees, submitted completed forms to request permission to proceed without prepaying fees, or signed the complaint after his claims were separated from a prior related case.

The court gave Ortiz 30 days to either pay $400 or submit a signed fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization. He also had to submit a signed declaration correcting the missing signature on his complaint.

Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk to mail the order to Ortiz and said no summons would issue yet. The case would be processed if he complied, but it would be dismissed if he did not. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ortiz v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-10127
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 8, 2020

Background

Juan Ortiz brought this action without a lawyer. The opinion states that he was being held in the Vernon C. Bain Center. He had been listed as a plaintiff in an amended complaint in a prior related proceeding, but he had not paid the fees for a federal civil action, submitted a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees, submitted a prisoner authorization, or signed the amended complaint. A magistrate judge had separated the claims of 13 prisoners into individual actions, and Ortiz’s claims proceeded under this docket number.

Fees and required documents

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in filing and administrative fees or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees by submitting a signed application and prisoner authorization. If that request is granted, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted that status.

Within 30 days, Ortiz had to either pay the $400 or complete, sign, and submit the required application and prisoner authorization. He also had to complete, sign, and submit a declaration form to correct his failure to sign the complaint. The court explained that a pleading filed by an unrepresented party must bear that party’s personal signature.

Disposition

Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk of Court to mail Ortiz a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Ortiz complied within the 30-day period, the action would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures. If he failed to comply, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.