Iantosca v. Elie Tahari, Ltd.
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-04527
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Iantosca v. Elie Tahari, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the action after settlement, allowing restoration by January 8, 2021, otherwise with prejudice.
Mark Iantosca and Elie Tahari Ltd.; the action was discontinued subject to possible restoration by January 8, 2021.
What happened
Iantosca v. Elie Tahari, Ltd. was dismissed after the parties told the court they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court canceled the scheduled conference and discontinued the case without costs to either party. The action could be restored if an application was made by January 8, 2021.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Iantosca v. Elie Tahari, Ltd. · No. 1:19-cv-04527
- Vyskocil
- Dec. 8, 2020
Background
The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Court’s Action
The court adjourned the conference scheduled for December 15, 2020, without setting a new date. It ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by January 8, 2021.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no application to restore the action was made by January 8, 2021, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.