Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 9, 2020

Tuy v. Major Cleaning, Inc.

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:20-cv-05230
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tuy v. Major Cleaning, Judge Cronan adjourned the initial conference, required a proposed settlement agreement, and terminated a pending motion.

Who this affects

Juan Tuy, Major Cleaning, Inc., and Adelson De Souza; the parties must submit a proposed settlement agreement for any claims requiring court approval.

What happened

In Tuy v. Major Cleaning, Inc., Juan Tuy sued Major Cleaning, Inc. and Adelson De Souza. The parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

The court adjourned the initial pretrial conference that had been scheduled for December 15, 2020. It directed the parties to submit by January 29, 2021, a proposed settlement agreement for any claims requiring court approval.

Judge John P. Cronan also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion pending at Docket 22. The order did not decide the underlying claims or state that the settlement had been finally approved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tuy v. Major Cleaning, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-05230
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Dec. 9, 2020

Background

The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims, the settlement's terms, or the motion listed at Docket 22.

Court's Actions

The court adjourned the initial pretrial conference scheduled for December 15, 2020, without setting a new date. It ordered the parties to submit by January 29, 2021, a proposed settlement agreement for any claims requiring court approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The court stated that any request for an extension had to comply with part 3.B of its Individual Rules.

Disposition

Judge John P. Cronan directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion pending at Docket 22. The order did not rule on the merits of Tuy's claims and did not state that the settlement was finally approved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.