Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 9, 2020

Meyers v. Port Authority of Trans Hudson

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:20-cv-09645
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Meyers v. Port Authority, Judge Broderick ordered the Marshals Service to serve defendants after Meyers received permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Who this affects

Rachel Meyers and the defendants named in the action were affected: PATH, Port Authority of NY/NJ, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Corbett Millard, Moyaah Phillips, David Volk, Raishea Haines, Arthur Blakey, Nicholas McCarthy, and Carlos Proano. The order arranged service through the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Meyers v. Port Authority of Trans Hudson (PATH), Rachel Meyers brought a case alleging that her employer discriminated against her because of her race, gender, pregnancy, and perceived disability. She also proceeded without a lawyer and raised possible claims involving her union and collective bargaining agreement.

The court had already granted Meyers permission to proceed without paying court fees. Because of that status, the court arranged for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants and extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses were issued.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the Clerk of Court to prepare the service forms, issue summonses, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service. The order handled service of the lawsuit and did not decide whether Meyers’s claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Meyers v. Port Authority of Trans Hudson · No. 1:20-cv-09645
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Dec. 9, 2020

Background

Rachel Meyers filed this pro se action, meaning she was representing herself, against Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH); Port Authority of NY/NJ; the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen; and Corbett Millard, Moyaah Phillips, David Volk, Raishea Haines, Arthur Blakey, Nicholas McCarthy, and Carlos Proano.

The complaint asserts discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the New York State Human Rights Law. Meyers alleges discrimination based on race, gender, pregnancy, and perceived disability. The court also said the complaint could be construed to assert claims involving an alleged breach of the collective bargaining agreement and the union’s alleged failure to fairly represent her.

Service of Process

The court had previously granted Meyers’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning she was permitted to proceed under the court’s fee-waiver process. The court explained that a plaintiff proceeding under that status may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 generally requires service within 90 days after filing. The court extended Meyers’s service deadline to 90 days after the summons was issued because she could not serve the defendants until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered issuance of the summons.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and deliver the required paperwork to the Marshals Service. The order also required Meyers to notify the court in writing if her address changed and warned that the action could be dismissed if she failed to do so.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick’s order addressed service of process only. It did not decide the merits of Meyers’s discrimination, union, or collective-bargaining claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.