Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 10, 2020

Artiles v. Superior One Management Corp.

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:20-cv-01809
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Artiles v. Superior One, Judge Cronan approved the wage-settlement agreement, approved fees, retained enforcement jurisdiction, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Juan Artiles, Superior One Management Corp., and the other defendants named in the case were affected by the approved settlement and dismissal with prejudice.

What happened

Artiles v. Superior One Management Corp. was a wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. Juan Artiles sought recovery from Superior One Management Corp. and other defendants.

The parties submitted a settlement agreement for court approval, along with materials supporting the request for attorneys’ fees and expenses. The court found the agreement fair and reasonable, including its release of claims, which was limited to the dispute.

Judge John P. Cronan approved the settlement and the requested fees and expenses, retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreement, and dismissed the case with prejudice. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Artiles v. Superior One Management Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-01809
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Dec. 10, 2020

Background

Juan Artiles brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law seeking recovery in a wage-and-hour dispute. The parties later filed a supplemental letter attaching their settlement agreement and explaining why the court should approve it. Plaintiff’s counsel also submitted materials supporting a request for attorneys’ fees and expenses.

Settlement Approval

The court approved the settlement agreement as fair and reasonable, considering the nature and scope of the claims and the risks and expenses of further litigation. The court noted counsel’s representation that Artiles attended the mediation, had assistance from a licensed translator, and participated in the negotiations.

The court also found that the settlement’s waiver of claims was tailored to this dispute and was not an overbroad release of unrelated or unknown claims.

Fees and Disposition

The court approved the requested attorneys’ fees and expenses as fair and reasonable. It noted that the requested amount was lower than the lodestar calculation—a method of estimating reasonable fees based on hours worked and an hourly rate—and was less than one-third of the settlement amount.

Judge John P. Cronan approved the settlement agreement, retained jurisdiction to enforce it, and dismissed the case with prejudice. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.