Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 10, 2020

Herring v. Medical Staff Unit

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-10088
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Herring v. Medical Staff Unit, Judge McMahon ordered Walter Herring to pay fees or submit required forms within 30 days before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Walter Herring was required to pay the fees or submit the required forms within 30 days. The case would be dismissed if he did not comply, and no summons would issue before compliance.

What happened

In Herring v. Medical Staff Unit, Walter Herring filed a civil case while incarcerated but did not pay the required fees or submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying them.

The court gave Herring 30 days to either pay $400 or submit the required application and authorization for deductions from his account. The authorization would allow the filing fee to be collected in installments. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and no summons would issue yet.

If Herring does not comply on time, the action will be dismissed; if he does comply, the Clerk’s Office will process the case. Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal would not qualify for fee-free status because it would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Herring v. Medical Staff Unit · No. 1:20-cv-10088
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Dec. 10, 2020

Background

Walter Herring, who was incarcerated at Orange County Jail and represented himself, filed this civil action against Medical Staff Unit and Orange County Jail. He submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Fee and authorization requirements

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400—the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee—or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. If the court grants the application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months. The court noted that the $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted this fee-waiver status.

Order

The court ordered Herring to pay the $400 or submit the required forms within 30 days of the order. The forms were to identify docket number 20-CV-10088 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail Herring a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Herring complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.