Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 10, 2020

Caraballo v. Pastilha

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:20-cv-10280
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Caraballo v. Pastilha, Chief Judge McMahon ordered plaintiffs to pay fees or submit signed applications to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Plaintiffs Hector Caraballo and Emily Rodriguez, who were required to pay the fees or submit separate signed applications within 30 days.

What happened

In Caraballo v. Pastilha, Hector Caraballo and Emily Rodriguez filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting applications to proceed without prepayment of fees.

The court gave both plaintiffs 30 days to pay $400 or submit separate, signed applications. The order said no summons would issue at that time and warned that the action would be dismissed if they did not comply.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order on December 10, 2020, and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees because the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Caraballo v. Pastilha · No. 7:20-cv-10280
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Dec. 10, 2020

Background

Hector Caraballo and Emily Rodriguez brought the action without a lawyer. They submitted a complaint but did not pay the required fees and did not submit applications asking to proceed without prepayment of fees.

Court’s order

The court explained that a plaintiff proceeding with a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—$350 for filing and $50 for administration—or submit a signed application under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 requesting permission to proceed without prepaying those fees. The court required each plaintiff to submit a separate signed application.

The court ordered the plaintiffs, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 or submit the applications, labeled with docket number 20-CV-10280 (CM). If the court grants the applications, the plaintiffs may proceed without prepaying the fees. No summons was to issue at that time. The order stated that the action would be dismissed if the plaintiffs failed to comply within the allowed time.

Other ruling and disposition

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to the plaintiffs and record service on the docket. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not itself dismiss the action; it directed the plaintiffs to pay the fees or submit the required applications.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.