Pena v. Downstate Correctional Facility Medical Department
- Nelson Roman
- 7:19-cv-07336-NSR
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Pena v. Downstate Correctional Facility Medical Department, Judge Roman directed service on Olayemi Odeniyi and denied appeal fee-free status.
Juan Pena and Defendant Olayemi Odeniyi; the order also directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to take specified steps.
What happened
In Pena v. Downstate Correctional Facility Medical Department, Juan Pena, who was incarcerated and represented himself, claimed that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights under a federal civil-rights law.
The court directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Olayemi Odeniyi and instructed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and provide the necessary service paperwork. Pena was told to notify the court of any address change and to ensure service within 90 days after the summons is issued.
Judge Nelson S. Roman also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Pena permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying constitutional claims.
The detailed version
- Pena v. Downstate Correctional Facility Medical Department · No. 7:19-cv-07336-NSR
- Nelson Roman
- Dec. 11, 2020
Background
Juan Pena, who was incarcerated at Bare Hill Correctional Facility, appeared without a lawyer and asserted that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights. The court treated his Third Amended Complaint as raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims against state actors for violating constitutional rights.
The court had previously allowed Pena to proceed without prepaying filing fees. In this supplemental order, the court directed service on Defendant Olayemi Odeniyi through the U.S. Marshals Service. The order identified Odeniyi’s service address as Downstate Correctional Facility and instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare the summons and the paperwork needed for service.
Rulings and Procedure
The court directed the Clerk to mail Pena a copy of the order and record proof of service on the docket. Pena was responsible for ensuring that service occurred within 90 days after the summons was issued and for requesting an extension if necessary. The order also stated that the action could be dismissed if Pena failed to notify the court of an address change.
Judge Nelson S. Roman certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order concerned service and appellate fee status; it did not resolve the merits of Pena’s constitutional claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.