Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 15, 2020

Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-07539
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Social SecurityCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Cave ordered Marshals service for the pro se plaintiff after fee-free status was granted.

Who this affects

Hugo Antonio Garcia, who was proceeding without a lawyer, and the Commissioner of Social Security. The order directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to complete service.

What happened

In Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security, Hugo Antonio Garcia, representing himself, challenged the denial of Social Security benefits. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees.

Because Garcia could proceed without paying fees, the court ordered the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to issue the summons and serve the Commissioner of Social Security. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave also directed Garcia to notify the court if his address changes and stated that the case could be dismissed if he fails to do so. The order addressed service only and did not decide whether Garcia was entitled to benefits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:20-cv-07539
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Dec. 15, 2020

Background

Hugo Antonio Garcia, proceeding without a lawyer, brought an action challenging the denial of Social Security benefits. The court had granted him permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Judge Paul E. Engelmayer adopted the recommendation granting that permission on November 2, 2020.

Service of process

Because Garcia was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court stated that he could not have served the summons and complaint until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered a summons issued. It therefore extended the deadline for service to 90 days after the summons is issued.

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete the U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the Commissioner of Social Security. The order stated that if service is not completed within the applicable period, Garcia should request an extension of time. It also required Garcia to notify the court in writing if his address changes and stated that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Disposition

Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the Clerk of Court to transmit the order to Garcia and to provide the Marshals Service with the materials necessary to serve the Commissioner. The opinion did not decide the merits of Garcia’s challenge to the denial of benefits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.