Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 18, 2020

Williams v. FedEx

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:20-cv-08190
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
EmploymentCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. FedEx, Judge Abrams ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the pro se plaintiff’s employer and extended the service deadline.

Who this affects

Christopher Ambrose Williams, who was proceeding without a lawyer, received instructions and Marshals Service assistance for serving Federal Express Corporation. The order also imposed an address-update requirement on Williams and directed the Clerk and Marshals Service to take specified service-related steps.

What happened

In Williams v. Federal Express Corporation, Christopher Ambrose Williams, representing himself, alleged that his employer fired him for protected activity in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The court had already allowed Williams to proceed without paying filing fees. Because he was proceeding that way, the court explained that the U.S. Marshals Service would handle service after a summons was issued, and it extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons date.

Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the service paperwork, issue a summons, and provide the materials to the Marshals Service for service on Federal Express Corporation. The order also required Williams to notify the court of any address change.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. FedEx · No. 1:20-cv-08190
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Dec. 18, 2020

Background

Christopher Ambrose Williams, proceeding without a lawyer, alleged that Federal Express Corporation unlawfully fired him for engaging in protected activity. He brought the claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. The opinion states that the court had previously granted his request to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of process

Because Williams was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court noted that the usual rule requires service within 90 days after filing the complaint, but Williams could not serve the summons and complaint until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered a summons issued.

The court therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. It stated that, if service was not completed within that period, Williams should request an extension of time.

Court’s instructions

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Federal Express Corporation, issue a summons, and send the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The opinion lists the service address for Federal Express Corporation as 3620 Hacks Cross Road, Building B, Second Floor, Memphis, Tennessee 38125, with Robbin Wilson Hutton, Esq., listed in connection with that address.

The court also stated that Williams must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so. The Clerk was directed to mail Williams the order and an information package. Judge Ronnie Abrams signed the order. This order addressed service and case administration; it did not decide whether Williams’s firing violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.