Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 18, 2020

U.S. Bank National Association v. Keybank, National Assication

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-03577
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In U.S. Bank v. Keybank, Judge Torres granted Berkadia permission to serve a deposition subpoena on Simon Miller by FedEx.

Who this affects

Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC may serve Simon Miller’s deposition subpoena by delivering it to his last known address by FedEx. The order also affects U.S. Bank National Association, whose counsel did not object.

What happened

U.S. Bank National Association sued KeyBank and Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC. Berkadia asked to serve a deposition subpoena on Simon Miller, a former Torchlight employee, by sending it to his last known address by FedEx. U.S. Bank’s counsel did not object.

The court found that Berkadia had tried six times to serve Miller at his residence. The court concluded that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 allowed this alternative method because it was reasonably suited to provide notice and because Berkadia had made diligent service attempts.

Judge Analisa Torres granted Berkadia leave to serve Miller by delivering the subpoena to his last known address by FedEx. The order concerned subpoena service and did not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
U.S. Bank National Association v. Keybank, National Assication · No. 1:20-cv-03577
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Dec. 18, 2020

Background

Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC asked the court for permission to use alternative service for a deposition subpoena directed to Simon Miller, a former employee of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC. Berkadia proposed delivering the subpoena to Miller’s last known address by FedEx. The plaintiff’s counsel did not object.

Court’s Analysis

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 generally requires delivery of a subpoena to the named person and, when attendance is required, payment of one day’s attendance fee and legally allowed mileage. The court reviewed decisions allowing alternative service in some circumstances, particularly when the serving party had diligently attempted personal service and had requested court permission in advance.

Berkadia represented that it had attempted service at Miller’s Los Angeles residence six times. On the fifth attempt, a neighbor confirmed that the residence was Miller’s current address. On the sixth attempt, a person who identified herself as Miller’s wife said that Miller would not come to the door to accept service.

The court concluded that Rule 45 should be interpreted consistently with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, which seeks the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of actions. It therefore allowed alternative service under the circumstances presented.

Disposition

Judge Analisa Torres granted Berkadia leave to serve Miller by delivering a copy of the deposition subpoena to his last known address by FedEx. This was a procedural discovery ruling; the order did not resolve the underlying claims between the parties.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.