Armstead v. Hellerstein
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-10647
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Armstead v. Hellerstein, Judge McMahon administratively closed a duplicate action and denied fee-free appeal status.
Brenda C. Armstead and the duplicate civil action docketed as 20-CV-10647 (CM).
What happened
In Armstead v. Hellerstein, Brenda C. Armstead, who represented herself, sent one submission that was mistakenly opened as two identical civil cases.
The court determined that this action was opened in error and directed the Clerk to administratively close it. The court also denied Armstead permission to appeal without paying filing fees.
Chief Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to mail Armstead the order, record service on the docket, and administratively close the action. She certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Armstead v. Hellerstein · No. 1:20-cv-10647
- Colleen McMahon
- Dec. 18, 2020
Background
Brenda C. Armstead brought the action without a lawyer. The court received one submission from her on December 15, 2020, but the submission was docketed twice and opened as two civil actions: 20-CV-10633 (UA) and 20-CV-10647 (CM). After reviewing both submissions, the court concluded that they were identical and that this action, 20-CV-10647 (CM), had been opened in error.
Ruling
The court directed the Clerk of Court to administratively close this action. Administrative closure was the specific action ordered; the opinion does not call it a dismissal. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Armstead a copy of the order and note service on the docket.
Appeal-Filing Determination
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Armstead permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees.
Disposition
Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the administrative closure of 20-CV-10647 (CM) and denied fee-free status for an appeal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.