Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 22, 2020

Bonneau v. LaManna

Judge
Andrew Krause
Docket
7:18-cv-02228-CS-AEK
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Bonneau v. LaManna, Judge Krause denied Jude Bonneau’s third request for appointed counsel without prejudice.

Who this affects

Jude Bonneau, the self-represented petitioner seeking appointed counsel.

What happened

Bonneau v. LaManna concerns Jude Bonneau’s third request for the court to appoint a lawyer to represent him. Bonneau was representing himself, and two earlier requests had been denied.

Bonneau’s latest request again referred to the death of his legal assistant from COVID-19. The court said the request did not explain how his circumstances now met the standards for appointing counsel and repeated the earlier request.

Judge Andrew E. Krause denied the request without prejudice, relying on the reasons given in the earlier rulings. The clerk was directed to mail the order to Bonneau.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bonneau v. LaManna · No. 7:18-cv-02228-CS-AEK
Judge
Andrew Krause
Date
Dec. 22, 2020

Background

Jude Bonneau, the petitioner, asked the court for appointment of counsel in this civil matter. The order states that Bonneau was representing himself. This was his third request for appointed counsel.

Earlier Requests

The court had previously denied two requests. On August 6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith denied Bonneau’s oral request after applying the factors from Hodge v. Police Officers, the standard used in that court’s circuit to decide whether appointing counsel in a civil case is appropriate. On June 4, 2020, Magistrate Judge Smith denied Bonneau’s written request. That request was based on the death of Bonneau’s legal assistant from COVID-19.

The June 4 order explained that Bonneau had not addressed the court’s earlier findings that he had not shown his claims were likely to succeed, had provided insufficient information about his efforts to obtain counsel, and was capable of handling the case without assistance at that time.

Third Request and Ruling

Bonneau’s November 14, 2020 letter, received and docketed on November 30, was his third request for counsel. The court said the letter again referred to the death of his legal assistant but did not explain how Bonneau now satisfied the relevant factors. The court concluded that the letter simply repeated the request previously denied.

Judge Andrew E. Krause denied Bonneau’s third request for appointment of counsel without prejudice, relying on the reasons in Magistrate Judge Smith’s earlier rulings. The clerk was directed to mail a copy of the order to Bonneau.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.