Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 22, 2020

Mercury Public Affairs, LLC v. Airbus Defence and Space, S.A.U.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:19-cv-07518
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Mercury Public Affairs v. Airbus Defence, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the settled action without costs, subject to restoration by January 22, 2021.

Who this affects

Mercury Public Affairs LLC and Airbus Defence and Space, S.A.U.; the case was discontinued under the stated restoration deadline.

What happened

Mercury Public Affairs LLC and Airbus Defence and Space, S.A.U. told the court that they had signed a settlement agreement.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and allowed either party to seek restoration of the case by January 22, 2021.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no restoration request was filed by that date, the dismissal would become with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mercury Public Affairs, LLC v. Airbus Defence and Space, S.A.U. · No. 1:19-cv-07518
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Dec. 22, 2020

Background

Mercury Public Affairs LLC sued Airbus Defence and Space, S.A.U., formerly known as Airbus Military. The opinion states that the parties informed the court that they had executed a settlement agreement.

Ruling

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. The court allowed an application to restore the action if made by January 22, 2021. The order states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect

The order resolved the case based on the parties’ settlement and did not decide the underlying claims. The opinion does not describe those claims or the settlement’s terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.