Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 4, 2021

Monroe v. Cambel

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:20-cv-10944
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Michael J. Monroe v. Sean Cambel, Judge McMahon ordered Monroe to pay fees or submit forms, warning the case would be dismissed for noncompliance.

Who this affects

Michael J. Monroe was required to pay the fees or submit the required forms within 30 days to keep the action moving; otherwise, the action would be dismissed. The defendants were not required to respond at this stage because no summons issued.

What happened

Michael J. Monroe sued Sean Cambel and others while incarcerated and without a lawyer. He submitted his complaint without paying the required fees or completing the forms needed to request permission to proceed without paying them upfront.

The court gave Monroe 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application and authorization allowing installment deductions from his account. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and no summons was to issue at that time.

Judge Colleen McMahon warned that the action would be dismissed if Monroe did not comply within 30 days. She also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith; the order did not dismiss the action at that time.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monroe v. Cambel · No. 7:20-cv-10944
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Jan. 4, 2021

Background

Michael J. Monroe, who was incarcerated at Rockland County Correctional Center, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He filed the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Fee and filing requirements

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. If that application is granted, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to deduct those payments and provide certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Monroe, within 30 days of January 4, 2021, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The documents were to identify docket number 20-CV-10944 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail Monroe a copy of the order and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Monroe complied and would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.

Appeal and warning

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a statutory “strike,” potentially limiting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future cases after three strikes, subject to the statutory exception for imminent danger of serious physical injury.

Disposition

This was a procedural filing-fee and prisoner-authorization order. The court did not dismiss the action in this order and did not decide the claims’ merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.