Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 5, 2021

Banks v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-08791
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Banks v. New York State Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Banks neither paid fees nor submitted required forms.

Who this affects

Christopher Banks's complaint against the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and the other named defendants was dismissed without prejudice. Banks was also denied permission to appeal without paying the appeal fee.

What happened

In Banks v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, the court had ordered Christopher Banks to submit forms requesting permission to proceed without paying the filing fee and authorizing deductions from a prisoner account, or to pay the required filing fees.

Banks did neither within the required thirty-day period. The court therefore dismissed his complaint without prejudice, meaning the opinion did not bar him from filing again.

Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to appeal without paying the appeal fee, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Banks v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision · No. 1:20-cv-08791
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 5, 2021

Background

The court had previously ordered Christopher Banks, within thirty days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the $400 in fees required to file a civil action. The earlier order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Ruling

The court found that Banks had not submitted the application and prisoner authorization and had not paid the fee. It dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

Appeal-Fee Determination

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Banks permission to appeal without paying the appeal fee. The clerk was directed to mail Banks a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.