Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 5, 2021

Perez v. Essex County

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-11050
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Perez v. Essex County, Judge McMahon transferred the case to New Jersey because venue was improper in New York.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs' case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; the defendants were affected by the change of court.

What happened

In Perez v. Essex County, the plaintiffs brought claims based on events that allegedly occurred after Delailah Perez gave birth at a hospital in Newark, New Jersey. They invoked federal-question and diversity jurisdiction and alleged that the defendants were citizens of New Jersey.

The court concluded that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because the plaintiffs did not allege that a substantial part of the relevant events occurred there. The court found that venue was proper in the District of New Jersey because the defendants resided there and the relevant events occurred there.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon transferred the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey under the federal venue statute. The Southern District of New York case was closed, and the transferee court was left to decide whether the plaintiffs could proceed without paying filing fees; the court also denied fee-free status for an appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. Essex County · No. 1:20-cv-11050
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 5, 2021

Background

Delailah Perez, a newborn and her two minor children, and Susan Suarez sued Essex County and other defendants. The opinion states that the plaintiffs reside in New York, New York, and assert claims under federal-question and diversity jurisdiction. Their claims arose from events allegedly occurring after Perez gave birth at University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey.

Venue Analysis

Federal venue law permits a civil action to be brought in certain districts, including a district where a defendant resides when the applicable conditions are met or where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred. The plaintiffs alleged that all defendants were citizens of New Jersey and that a substantial part of the relevant events occurred there.

The court held that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because the plaintiffs did not allege that a substantial part of the relevant events or omissions arose in that district. The court held that venue lay in the District of New Jersey because all defendants resided in New Jersey and a substantial part of the events occurred there.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The clerk was directed to mail the order to the plaintiffs and transfer the action. The opinion states that whether the plaintiffs could proceed without prepaying fees would be decided by the transferee court, and that no summons would issue from the Southern District of New York. The order closed the case in that court.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied the plaintiffs fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The court did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.