DiResta v. Biz2Credit Inc.
- Lewis Liman
- 1:21-cv-00208
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In DiResta v. Biz2Credit Inc., Judge Azrack transferred the ADEA case to the Southern District of New York because venue was proper there.
Timothy DiResta’s age-discrimination case was transferred from the Eastern District of New York to the Southern District of New York; Biz2Credit Inc. and Shujah A. Awan were affected as defendants. The court did not decide the underlying claims.
What happened
In DiResta v. Biz2Credit Inc., Timothy DiResta sued Biz2Credit Inc. and Shujah A. Awan under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. He represented himself, and the opinion states that he is an attorney admitted to practice in the court.
The court found that the defendants were located at 1 Penn Plaza in New York County and that the events underlying the lawsuit allegedly occurred there. Because New York County is in the Southern District of New York, venue was proper there rather than in the Eastern District of New York.
Judge Joan M. Azrack transferred the case to the Southern District of New York under the federal venue-transfer law instead of dismissing it. The court directed the clerk to close the case and denied any request to appeal without paying fees because it certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith; the opinion did not decide the age-discrimination claims.
The detailed version
- DiResta v. Biz2Credit Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-00208
- Lewis Liman
- Jan. 11, 2021
Background
Timothy DiResta, representing himself, sued Biz2Credit Inc. and Shujah A. Awan under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. The court noted that although DiResta was proceeding without a lawyer, he is an attorney admitted to practice in the Eastern District of New York.
Venue Analysis
The general federal venue statute permits a civil action to be brought where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The opinion states that the defendants were located at 1 Penn Plaza, 45th Floor, New York, New York, and that the events giving rise to DiResta’s claims allegedly occurred at that address. Because New York County is in the Southern District of New York, the court concluded that venue was proper there.
The court stated that there appeared to be no connection to the Eastern District of New York other than DiResta’s residence in Nassau County. Under the federal statute allowing transfer from an improper venue, the court determined that transfer served the interests of justice.
Disposition
The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), directed the clerk to transfer the case and mail DiResta a copy of the order, and directed the clerk to mark the case closed. The court did not rule on the merits of the age-discrimination claims. It also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied, for purposes of any appeal, any request by DiResta to proceed without paying filing fees.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.