Fonseca v. Department of Corrections
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-09398
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Fonseca v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon dismissed Andre Fonseca’s complaint without prejudice after he failed to pay fees or submit required forms.
Andre Fonseca’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and his request to appeal without paying filing fees was denied.
What happened
In Fonseca v. Department of Corrections, the court had ordered Andre Fonseca to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the required fees within 30 days.
The order was returned because Fonseca was no longer held at the listed facility. He did not comply, tell the court about his new mailing address, or contact the court further.
Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice. She also denied Fonseca permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Fonseca v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09398
- Colleen McMahon
- Jan. 12, 2021
Background
Andre Fonseca sued Commissioner Cynthia Brann and other defendants. On November 13, 2020, the court ordered Fonseca, within 30 days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees and a prisoner authorization or to pay the $400 in fees required to bring a civil action in the court. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.
On January 5, 2021, the order was returned to the court with a notation that Fonseca was no longer held at that facility. Fonseca had not complied with the order, had not notified the court of a change in mailing address, and had not otherwise contacted the court.
Ruling
The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The dismissal was based on Fonseca’s failure to comply with the court’s filing-fee or fee-waiver requirements and his failure to keep the court informed of his address; the opinion does not decide the underlying claims.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. A footnote explains that although federal filing fees increased to $402 on December 1, 2020, the $400 fee applied because Fonseca filed the action before that date.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.