Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 14, 2021

Griffith v. Clarkstown Police Dept.

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:20-cv-06505
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
14
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Griffith v. Clarkstown Police Dept., Judge Halpern dismissed some claims during screening, added the Town of Clarkstown, and ordered service on two defendants.

Who this affects

Brandon Griffith’s claims against the Clarkstown Police Department and the official-capacity claims against Papenmeyer and Sgt. John Doe were dismissed. The Town of Clarkstown was added as a defendant, service was ordered on Papenmeyer and the Town, and the Town Attorney was ordered to identify Sgt. John Doe. Claims against the other named defendants were left for a separate order.

What happened

In Griffith v. Clarkstown Police Dept., Brandon Griffith, who was representing himself, brought claims for money damages under a federal civil-rights law against the Clarkstown Police Department, Police Officer Papenmeyer, unidentified officers, and others.

The court dismissed the claims against the Clarkstown Police Department and the claims against Papenmeyer and Sgt. John Doe in their official capacities. It added the Town of Clarkstown as a defendant, ordered service on Papenmeyer and the Town through the U.S. Marshals Service, and ordered the Town Attorney to identify Sgt. John Doe. The court said it would address claims against the remaining defendants in a separate order.

In Griffith v. Clarkstown Police Dept., Judge Halpern also required Griffith to file an amended complaint after receiving information about Sgt. John Doe and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Griffith v. Clarkstown Police Dept. · No. 7:20-cv-06505
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Jan. 14, 2021

Background

Brandon Griffith filed this prisoner civil-rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and sought damages. He was representing himself. He filed the complaint while incarcerated at Auburn Correctional Facility and was later serving a term of parole supervision. The defendants named in the complaint were the Clarkstown Police Department; Police Officer Papenmeyer, Badge No. 508; an unidentified Clarkstown Police Sergeant identified as “John Doe”; “AMKC Rikers Island”; “Harts Island”; AMKC Deputy Warden Foo; and an unidentified AMKC physician identified as “Dr. Jane Doe.” The opinion explains that “AMKC” refers to the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island.

The court had previously allowed Griffith to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a federal court must screen certain prisoner complaints and dismiss claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a legally sufficient claim, seek money from an immune defendant, or fall outside the court’s jurisdiction.

Claims Against the Clarkstown Police Department and Official-Capacity Claims

The court dismissed Griffith’s claims against the Clarkstown Police Department because, under New York law, a municipal department does not have a separate legal identity that allows it to be sued. The court also dismissed Griffith’s claims against Papenmeyer and Sgt. John Doe in their official capacities. It stated that an official-capacity claim against a local government officer is treated as a claim against the municipality itself, and that the municipality can be sued directly.

The court construed Griffith’s complaint as intending to assert claims against the Town of Clarkstown. It directed the Clerk of Court to add the Town as a defendant. The court stated that this addition was without prejudice to any defenses the Town might raise.

Service and Identification of Sgt. John Doe

Because Griffith was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court ordered the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to handle service of the summons and complaint. The court directed that summonses and service paperwork be prepared for Papenmeyer and the Town of Clarkstown. It extended the time for service until 90 days after summonses were issued for those defendants.

The court found that Griffith had provided enough information for the Clarkstown Police Department to identify Sgt. John Doe as the sergeant who allegedly arrested Griffith with Papenmeyer in May 2018 at a gas station in West Nyack, New York. It ordered the Town Attorney to provide Griffith and the court with Sgt. John Doe’s identity, badge number, and service address within 60 days.

After receiving that information, Griffith must file an amended complaint naming the newly identified defendant within 30 days. The amended complaint will replace, rather than supplement, the original complaint. The court stated that it would screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue another order directing service.

Disposition

The court dismissed Griffith’s claims against the Clarkstown Police Department and his claims against Papenmeyer and Sgt. John Doe in their official capacities. It directed the Clerk of Court to add the Town of Clarkstown as a defendant and to arrange service on Papenmeyer and the Town. It also ordered the Town Attorney to identify Sgt. John Doe and provided an amended civil-rights complaint form.

Judge Philip M. Halpern certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The opinion states that claims against the other defendants would be addressed in a separate order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 14-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.